Fully agree with you. The point I am trying to make is on that performance many concluded that he was not very good at doing the things that centre halves are in the team for and that is not really scoring 90|| minute winners. Massive bonus of course."OXUFC4Life" wrote: I'm not saying he had a good game, you name me a player that day who did, he saved our bacon though. That win was vital which gave us the kick start to the season
Futcher - A Bury fan's view
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
-
- Toddler
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:55 am
- Location: Oxford
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton. He might come from a line of footballing greats with Father, Uncles and Cousins (Danny Murphy) it certainly doesn't mean it follows, which in Futcher's case it doesn't. Worley carried him the other night a couple of headers from him maybe but at the moment not impressed."Baboo" wrote:Fully agree with you. The point I am trying to make is on that performance many concluded that he was not very good at doing the things that centre halves are in the team for and that is not really scoring 90|| minute winners. Massive bonus of course."OXUFC4Life" wrote: I'm not saying he had a good game, you name me a player that day who did, he saved our bacon though. That win was vital which gave us the kick start to the season
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
[quote="OXUFC4Life"
Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton.[/quote]
So what you are saying is Chris Wilder has got it wrong in this instance.
Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton.[/quote]
So what you are saying is Chris Wilder has got it wrong in this instance.
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
Blimey, my chances of a contract with Oxford have suddenly improved then...not only can I talk and organise, I can also tell jokes, cut half-time oranges and I'm really good at doing the laundry. If footballing ability is suddenly irrevelant....where do I apply...?!!"Pie Eater" wrote:Quite right he did a lot of talking and organising, which is really why he was signed."Baboo" wrote:Improvement yes, but I can't remember a lot of what he did. Many others stood out a lot more, but we didn't get him in to stand out."Sackcloth Ox" wrote:[
How did Wotton play against Chesterfield? Was there an improvement from Gills, I hope so!
-
- Brat
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 11:43 am
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
So what you are saying is Chris Wilder has got it wrong in this instance.[/quote]"Baboo" wrote:[quote="OXUFC4Life"
Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton.
Yes.
-
- Toddler
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:55 am
- Location: Oxford
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
"The OXman Cometh" wrote:So what you are saying is Chris Wilder has got it wrong in this instance."Baboo" wrote:[quote="OXUFC4Life"
Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton.
Yes.[/quote]
Certainly do

-
- Puberty
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:18 pm
- Location: Wales
Re: Futcher - A Bury fan's view
Agree with that. Creighton's a blunt instrument, but at least he's our blunt instrument, and he's shown in the past how effective he can be. If Wilder wants to bring through Worley, then I respect that - but Creighton is the better first reserve for that position."OXUFC4Life" wrote:Take it from me Futcher will not be as good as Creighton.
-
- Brat
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:51 pm
Funny how it's unfair that Creighton wasn't given long enough to prove himself in league two, yet Futcher has been written (and slagged) off after three games.
I'm not saying he's going to be a world beater or even better than Creighton, but I think it's at least worth giving him a chance (I'm talking the fans point of view not Wilder's). He's clearly not match fit and I think the last defender we brought in who had a shaky start proved himself to be pretty decent once he got fit (shame he can't stay that way at the moment).
I'm not saying he's going to be a world beater or even better than Creighton, but I think it's at least worth giving him a chance (I'm talking the fans point of view not Wilder's). He's clearly not match fit and I think the last defender we brought in who had a shaky start proved himself to be pretty decent once he got fit (shame he can't stay that way at the moment).
Re:
Very good points."headless_pnub" wrote:Funny how it's unfair that Creighton wasn't given long enough to prove himself in league two, yet Futcher has been written (and slagged) off after three games.
I'm not saying he's going to be a world beater or even better than Creighton, but I think it's at least worth giving him a chance (I'm talking the fans point of view not Wilder's). He's clearly not match fit and I think the last defender we brought in who had a shaky start proved himself to be pretty decent once he got fit (shame he can't stay that way at the moment).