Jake Wright?"Joey's Toe" wrote: I guess if the combination of Futcher's experience and Worley's/Franks' potential is a better long-term bet, then we have to go with Wilder's judgement.
This weeks new signings
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 12:18 pm
- Location: Wales
Re:
Him too, obviously. I meant it more in the sense that Worley and Franks are clearly ones for the future, whereas Wright is closer to being the finished product. Didn't express that very well!"Baboo" wrote:Jake Wright?"Joey's Toe" wrote: I guess if the combination of Futcher's experience and Worley's/Franks' potential is a better long-term bet, then we have to go with Wilder's judgement.
-
- Toddler
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:55 am
- Location: Oxford
Re:
CW comment "nothing personal", yeah come on! Upset CW and you are out. Don't be surprised to see Creights playing against us come January."deanwindass" wrote:Phew - it's Wrexham
http://www.wrexhamafc.co.uk ... 00.html
-
- Dashing young thing
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:16 pm
Re:
[/quote]
CW comment "nothing personal", yeah come on! Upset CW and you are out. Don't be surprised to see Creights playing against us come January.[/quote]
Can't see why it would be 'personal' at all? A number on here seem to think thta he is not good enough for league 2. Presumably CW thinks the same.
I think that he generally did well for us last season. He did have a dip in form when day came in, but he came back strongly.
He seems a decent guy and I reckon that it is a good signing for Wrexham who seem to be bringing in more sensible type of players this season.
CW comment "nothing personal", yeah come on! Upset CW and you are out. Don't be surprised to see Creights playing against us come January.[/quote]
Can't see why it would be 'personal' at all? A number on here seem to think thta he is not good enough for league 2. Presumably CW thinks the same.
I think that he generally did well for us last season. He did have a dip in form when day came in, but he came back strongly.
He seems a decent guy and I reckon that it is a good signing for Wrexham who seem to be bringing in more sensible type of players this season.
-
- Brat
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:51 pm
Why is it that whenever anyone leaves the club people come to the conclusion that it must be personal. What a poor opinion of Wilder they must have to think he would get rid for that reason alone.
Since the start of the season Creighton has been below Worley in the pecking order (something he wasn't best pleased by) and with the signing of Futcher for his experience I guess Creighton has dropped further.
He's a decent BSP player and deserves a starting place, but he's not going to get it here. I'd have thought more than anything it was a mutual decision.
Since the start of the season Creighton has been below Worley in the pecking order (something he wasn't best pleased by) and with the signing of Futcher for his experience I guess Creighton has dropped further.
He's a decent BSP player and deserves a starting place, but he's not going to get it here. I'd have thought more than anything it was a mutual decision.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Well, and last season, for much of that ugly period, he was behind Day in the pecking order too (and that was an error): you certainly get the impression that Wilder doesn't rate him, for whatever reason: acquiring Worley, Franks and now Futcher all seem to be ways for Wilder to solve his Creighton problem.
Well, I'll miss watching him play that's two players I enjoyed watching gone, not very enamoured at the moment.
Well, I'll miss watching him play that's two players I enjoyed watching gone, not very enamoured at the moment.
-
- Brat
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:51 pm
Day took his chance and rightfully kept Creighton out of the squad. Until his injury he was a rock at the back. So it's a bit harsh to say it was a mistake.
Once Day got injured though, Creighton upped his game and deserved his place right the way through the rest of the season.
I like Creighton and think he's a great character to have at the club, but I also think we can get better players than him and need to to improve.
Once Day got injured though, Creighton upped his game and deserved his place right the way through the rest of the season.
I like Creighton and think he's a great character to have at the club, but I also think we can get better players than him and need to to improve.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Re:
I don't agree with that, I'm afraid. I would have said "Day made many errors but kept his place because Wilder did not want to play Creighton"."headless_pnub" wrote:Day took his chance and rightfully kept Creighton out of the squad.
-
- Toddler
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:55 am
- Location: Oxford
Re:
Day did not keep Creighton out of the squad through quality, it was CW and Creighton having words which caused Creighton to be dropped."headless_pnub" wrote:Day took his chance and rightfully kept Creighton out of the squad. Until his injury he was a rock at the back. So it's a bit harsh to say it was a mistake.
Once Day got injured though, Creighton upped his game and deserved his place right the way through the rest of the season.
I like Creighton and think he's a great character to have at the club, but I also think we can get better players than him and need to to improve.
-
- Dashing young thing
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:16 pm
Really?
I thought that Creighton started pretty well and definitely had a dip in form before he was dropped. Day started particularly well and also faded.
When Creighton came back he had a couple of poor games and then played well and deserved to be in the team.
I would think it marginal that Creighton can be a good player in this Division and so trying to replace hi with somebody better to play along side Wright seems reasonably sensible to me.
I thought that Creighton started pretty well and definitely had a dip in form before he was dropped. Day started particularly well and also faded.
When Creighton came back he had a couple of poor games and then played well and deserved to be in the team.
I would think it marginal that Creighton can be a good player in this Division and so trying to replace hi with somebody better to play along side Wright seems reasonably sensible to me.
Re:
It's fairly obvious that Creighton is a very good Conference player, but all his career he's been knocking about non-league and is quite old, so there's always going to be a question mark over whether he can step up to league football or not. That brainless dive in at Bradford was probably the last straw, that wasn't what you'd expect from your most experienced centre half."Ancient Colin" wrote:I don't agree with that, I'm afraid. I would have said "Day made many errors but kept his place because Wilder did not want to play Creighton"."headless_pnub" wrote:Day took his chance and rightfully kept Creighton out of the squad.
Wilder signed him remember and has decided he can't hack it to the required standard in this league (there wasn't queue of league clubs to take him off our hands either) - that's not a personal decision is it? Although Creighton may well have taken the decision personally, I think there's quite a lot of guesswork with any of this. Fans often claim it's a "personal" decision when one of their favourites gets left out or dropped.
Out of all the controversial decisions wilder has made to turf popular players out, not that many have actually gone on to do very much have they? How many are playing at clubs above us now? Yemi, Haldane (although both of them were finance based weren't they?) are all I can think of. There certainly wasn't this sort of outcry when Yemi left.
On
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:05 am
- Location: Blakeney, Gloucs
Re:
Do you think he'll get a League Two club then?"OXUFC4Life" wrote:CW comment "nothing personal", yeah come on! Upset CW and you are out. Don't be surprised to see Creights playing against us come January."deanwindass" wrote:Phew - it's Wrexham
http://www.wrexhamafc.co.uk ... 00.html